Hemorrhagic Stroke ICP Targets & Management


Hemorrhagic Stroke ICP Targets & Management

In managing a hemorrhagic stroke, a key physiological parameter is the strain inside the cranium. Medical professionals goal to take care of this strain inside a particular vary, usually under 20 mmHg, to reduce secondary mind damage. This cautious regulation is crucial as a result of elevated strain can compress delicate mind tissue and prohibit blood move, resulting in additional neurological harm.

Sustaining optimum cerebral perfusion strain, the distinction between imply arterial strain and intracranial strain, is essential for delivering oxygen and vitamins to the mind. Traditionally, aggressive interventions had been employed to decrease intracranial strain, however modern administration methods emphasize a balanced strategy, contemplating particular person affected person components and the dynamic nature of hemorrhagic stroke. This cautious management has demonstrably improved affected person outcomes by lowering mortality and long-term incapacity.

This text will additional discover the intricacies of intracranial strain administration in hemorrhagic stroke, together with monitoring methods, pharmacological and surgical interventions, and the newest analysis developments on this crucial space of neurocritical care. It’s going to additionally talk about the challenges and controversies surrounding optimum strain targets, customized remedy methods, and the function of superior neuroimaging in guiding therapeutic choices.

1. Individualized Targets

Individualized targets for intracranial strain (ICP) administration in hemorrhagic stroke symbolize a shift from a one-size-fits-all strategy to a extra nuanced, patient-centered technique. Whereas pointers usually counsel sustaining ICP under 20 mmHg, this worth serves as a common benchmark moderately than an absolute rule. The optimum ICP goal for a particular affected person is dependent upon a fancy interaction of things, together with age, pre-existing medical situations corresponding to hypertension or diabetes, stroke severity, and the presence of different neurological accidents. As an example, a youthful affected person with a smaller hematoma and no prior medical historical past would possibly tolerate a barely increased ICP with out vital neurological compromise, whereas an older affected person with a big hematoma and a historical past of hypertension would possibly require extra aggressive ICP administration to stop additional mind harm. This individualized strategy acknowledges the heterogeneity of hemorrhagic stroke and the potential for hurt from overly aggressive or inadequate ICP management.

The rationale for individualized targets stems from the understanding that cerebral perfusion strain (CPP), the distinction between imply arterial strain (MAP) and ICP, is the crucial determinant of mind tissue oxygenation. Sustaining enough CPP is paramount. In sufferers with pre-existing hypertension, for instance, decreasing MAP too aggressively to attain a particular ICP goal may compromise CPP and result in cerebral ischemia. Conversely, in sufferers with fragile cerebrovascular autoregulation, a barely elevated ICP could be tolerated if CPP stays inside a secure vary. Think about a affected person with a historical past of poorly managed hypertension who presents with a hemorrhagic stroke. This affected person’s mind could be accustomed to the next MAP, and aggressively decreasing blood strain to attain a typical ICP goal may lead to insufficient CPP. Due to this fact, a barely increased ICP goal could be acceptable if CPP stays adequate to take care of cerebral blood move.

Individualized ICP targets require cautious medical judgment, steady monitoring, and frequent reassessment. Neurological examinations, imaging research, and steady ICP monitoring present useful information that information therapeutic choices. This dynamic strategy acknowledges the evolving nature of hemorrhagic stroke and the potential for modifications in ICP and CPP over time. Challenges stay in defining exact individualized targets, and additional analysis is required to develop extra subtle algorithms that incorporate patient-specific variables and real-time physiological information. Nonetheless, the precept of individualized ICP administration represents a big advance in neurocritical care, selling a extra customized and efficient strategy to mitigating secondary mind damage after hemorrhagic stroke.

2. Beneath 20 mmHg usually

Intracranial strain (ICP) administration in hemorrhagic stroke goals to reduce secondary mind damage by controlling strain inside the cranium. Whereas individualized targets are paramount, the “under 20 mmHg usually” guideline serves as a vital place to begin and benchmark for therapeutic interventions. This goal displays a steadiness between stopping extreme strain and avoiding overly aggressive remedy that would compromise cerebral perfusion. Understanding the nuances of this benchmark requires analyzing its sides within the context of hemorrhagic stroke.

  • Rationale for the 20 mmHg Threshold

    The 20 mmHg threshold is derived from medical expertise and analysis indicating that sustained elevations above this degree are related to elevated morbidity and mortality. Elevated ICP compromises cerebral blood move, resulting in ischemia and neuronal harm. Whereas some sufferers might tolerate barely increased pressures for brief intervals, persistent elevation above 20 mmHg necessitates intervention. This threshold gives a transparent goal for clinicians and facilitates immediate remedy.

  • Balancing ICP with Cerebral Perfusion Strain (CPP)

    Sustaining enough CPP, the distinction between imply arterial strain (MAP) and ICP, is as essential as controlling ICP. Decreasing ICP too aggressively can inadvertently lower CPP, particularly in sufferers with compromised autoregulation. The 20 mmHg goal permits for some flexibility in managing each ICP and MAP to optimize CPP and guarantee enough mind tissue oxygenation. For instance, if decreasing ICP to under 20 mmHg leads to a critically low CPP, clinicians would possibly modify the goal upwards whereas implementing methods to enhance MAP.

  • Interaction with Particular person Affected person Elements

    The “under 20 mmHg usually” guideline acknowledges the significance of particular person affected person components. Age, comorbidities, stroke severity, and different neurological accidents affect the optimum ICP goal. Whereas 20 mmHg serves as a place to begin, clinicians should think about these components and modify the goal accordingly. A youthful affected person with a small hematoma would possibly tolerate a barely increased ICP, whereas an older affected person with extreme hypertension and a big hematoma would possibly require a decrease goal.

  • Steady Monitoring and Reassessment

    ICP is dynamic and may fluctuate considerably. Steady monitoring is crucial to make sure adherence to the goal and to detect any acute modifications requiring intervention. Common reassessment of the affected person’s neurological standing and ICP tendencies permits for changes within the remedy technique as wanted. This dynamic strategy ensures that the ICP goal stays acceptable all through the course of the sickness.

The “under 20 mmHg usually” precept in hemorrhagic stroke administration gives a framework for focused ICP management. Nonetheless, its utility requires cautious consideration of particular person affected person traits and steady monitoring. This balanced strategy optimizes outcomes by minimizing secondary mind damage whereas preserving cerebral perfusion.

3. Stability with Cerebral Perfusion

Sustaining the fragile steadiness between intracranial strain (ICP) and cerebral perfusion strain (CPP) is paramount in managing hemorrhagic stroke. CPP, calculated because the distinction between imply arterial strain (MAP) and ICP, represents the driving power of blood move to the mind. The goal for ICP administration is intrinsically linked to CPP optimization. Decreasing ICP is essential, however not on the expense of compromising CPP. Excessively aggressive ICP discount can inadvertently lower MAP, resulting in insufficient cerebral blood move and doubtlessly worsening ischemic damage. Conversely, uncontrolled ICP elevation can compress cerebral vessels, additionally diminishing CPP. This intricate interaction necessitates a balanced strategy.

Think about a affected person with a hemorrhagic stroke and an elevated ICP of 25 mmHg. Aggressive interventions to quickly decrease ICP would possibly contain administering osmotic diuretics or hyperventilation. Whereas these measures can successfully cut back ICP, they’ll additionally lower MAP. If the affected person’s MAP drops considerably, the ensuing lower in CPP could cause ischemia within the surrounding mind tissue. In such situations, a extra balanced technique would possibly contain cautiously decreasing ICP whereas concurrently supporting MAP with fluids or vasopressors. This strategy goals to attain a goal ICP under 20 mmHg whereas sustaining a CPP inside a secure vary, usually above 60 mmHg. One other instance includes a affected person with chronically elevated blood strain. In such instances, decreasing MAP too aggressively would possibly compromise cerebral blood move, because the mind’s autoregulatory mechanisms are tailored to the next strain. Due to this fact, a barely increased ICP goal could be acceptable if it permits for upkeep of enough CPP.

The sensible significance of this understanding lies within the individualized strategy to ICP administration. A hard and fast ICP goal may not be acceptable for all sufferers. Clinicians should think about particular person components, together with age, comorbidities, and the severity of the hemorrhage, alongside steady monitoring of ICP and CPP, to tailor remedy methods successfully. This nuanced strategy goals to reduce secondary mind damage by balancing the necessity to management ICP with the crucial requirement of preserving cerebral perfusion. The problem lies within the dynamic nature of hemorrhagic stroke, necessitating steady vigilance and changes to remedy primarily based on real-time physiological information and the affected person’s evolving neurological standing. This dynamic strategy emphasizes the continuing want for analysis to additional refine individualized targets and optimize outcomes in hemorrhagic stroke.

4. Steady Monitoring Very important

Steady intracranial strain (ICP) monitoring performs a vital function in managing hemorrhagic stroke and attaining focused ICP management. The dynamic nature of hemorrhagic stroke, characterised by potential fluctuations in bleeding, edema formation, and cerebrovascular reactivity, necessitates real-time evaluation of ICP. This steady monitoring gives important information for informing therapeutic choices and titrating interventions to take care of ICP inside the desired vary, usually under 20 mmHg whereas preserving cerebral perfusion strain (CPP). With out steady monitoring, clinicians can be working with incomplete info, rising the danger of delayed or insufficient interventions and doubtlessly exacerbating secondary mind damage.

Think about a affected person who presents with a hemorrhagic stroke and an initially steady ICP. With out steady monitoring, a subsequent rise in ICP resulting from hematoma enlargement or mind swelling would possibly go undetected, resulting in a crucial delay in implementing acceptable therapies. Steady monitoring permits for immediate detection of such modifications, enabling well timed interventions corresponding to osmotic remedy, managed hyperventilation, or surgical decompression. Conversely, steady monitoring additionally helps keep away from overly aggressive remedy. As an example, if a affected person’s ICP responds favorably to preliminary remedy, steady information can information changes to keep away from extreme ICP discount, which may compromise CPP and result in cerebral ischemia. Actual-time information facilitates a dynamic and responsive strategy to ICP administration, optimizing the steadiness between stopping elevated ICP and sustaining enough cerebral perfusion.

The sensible significance of steady ICP monitoring extends past speedy medical decision-making. Knowledge collected over time gives useful insights into the affected person’s response to remedy, permitting for refinement of remedy methods and prediction of potential problems. Moreover, steady monitoring facilitates analysis into the pathophysiology of hemorrhagic stroke and the effectiveness of assorted interventions. Regardless of its significance, steady ICP monitoring shouldn’t be with out challenges. It requires specialised tools and experience, and problems corresponding to an infection or catheter malfunction can happen. Nonetheless, the advantages of steady monitoring in guiding focused ICP administration and in the end bettering affected person outcomes in hemorrhagic stroke considerably outweigh these dangers. This understanding underscores the essential function of steady ICP monitoring as an integral part of complete neurocritical care in managing hemorrhagic stroke.

5. Keep away from Secondary Mind Harm

A main aim of focused intracranial strain (ICP) administration in hemorrhagic stroke is the prevention of secondary mind damage. This refers back to the cascade of damaging occasions that happen after the preliminary bleed, exacerbating neurological harm and worsening affected person outcomes. Elevated ICP performs a central function on this cascade, making its management paramount in neurocritical care. By concentrating on and sustaining ICP inside a particular vary, usually under 20 mmHg, clinicians goal to mitigate the components that contribute to secondary mind damage and protect neurological operate.

  • Lowered Cerebral Blood Circulate

    Elevated ICP compresses cerebral vessels, lowering blood move to the mind tissue. This compromised perfusion deprives neurons of important oxygen and vitamins, resulting in ischemia and mobile harm. Controlling ICP helps preserve enough cerebral blood move, minimizing the danger of ischemic damage and subsequent neurological deficits.

  • Herniation Syndromes

    Extreme ICP elevation could cause mind herniation, a life-threatening complication the place mind tissue is displaced from its regular place. This displacement can compress important constructions just like the brainstem, resulting in respiratory and cardiovascular compromise. Focused ICP administration goals to stop such herniation syndromes, preserving neurological operate and stopping deadly outcomes. As an example, uncal herniation, a kind of mind herniation, can happen resulting from elevated ICP and compress the oculomotor nerve, affecting eye actions.

  • Edema Formation and Mobile Swelling

    Hemorrhagic stroke triggers inflammatory responses that contribute to edema formation and mobile swelling. This additional will increase ICP, making a vicious cycle of escalating strain and neurological harm. Controlling ICP by measures like osmotic remedy helps cut back edema and restrict the extent of secondary damage. Particularly, medicines like mannitol can draw water out of the mind tissue, lowering swelling and decreasing ICP.

  • Disrupted Mobile Metabolism

    Elevated ICP disrupts mobile metabolism inside the mind, impairing neuronal operate and rising the vulnerability of mind cells to additional harm. Sustaining ICP inside a secure vary helps mobile operate and helps protect neurological integrity. This metabolic disruption can exacerbate the consequences of the preliminary hemorrhage, resulting in a higher extent of neurological impairment.

By understanding the multifaceted nature of secondary mind damage and the central function of elevated ICP in its growth, clinicians can implement focused methods to mitigate these damaging processes. Sustaining ICP inside a particular vary by steady monitoring, pharmacological interventions, and surgical procedures, when mandatory, contributes considerably to improved affected person outcomes after hemorrhagic stroke. This focused strategy acknowledges the dynamic interaction between ICP and cerebral perfusion, emphasizing the significance of a balanced technique that minimizes secondary damage whereas preserving enough blood move to the mind.

6. Multimodal Administration Method

Reaching and sustaining the goal intracranial strain (ICP) following a hemorrhagic stroke usually necessitates a multimodal administration strategy. This technique acknowledges the advanced interaction of physiological components influencing ICP and employs a mixture of therapeutic interventions tailor-made to the person affected person’s wants. The aim is to optimize ICP management whereas preserving cerebral perfusion and minimizing secondary mind damage. This strategy strikes past single-intervention methods and embraces a extra complete and adaptable framework for managing this crucial side of neurocritical care.

  • Medical Administration

    Medical administration varieties the cornerstone of the multimodal strategy. This contains administering osmotic diuretics, corresponding to mannitol, to cut back mind edema and decrease ICP. Different medicines, like antihypertensives, could also be used to manage blood strain and preserve cerebral perfusion strain (CPP). Sedatives may help cut back metabolic demand and management ICP, whereas analgesics handle ache and discomfort, not directly contributing to ICP management. For instance, a affected person presenting with elevated ICP would possibly obtain mannitol alongside antihypertensive medicine to decrease ICP whereas sustaining enough CPP.

  • Surgical Interventions

    In some instances, surgical intervention turns into essential to handle ICP. Hematoma evacuation, for instance, can instantly cut back the mass impact and decrease ICP. Decompressive craniectomy, involving the elimination of a portion of the cranium, permits for mind swelling and reduces strain inside the cranial cavity. These procedures are usually reserved for instances the place medical administration alone is inadequate to manage ICP or in conditions involving massive hematomas inflicting vital mass impact. A affected person with a big, space-occupying hematoma would possibly require surgical evacuation to alleviate strain and stop herniation.

  • Ventilatory Administration

    Ventilatory administration performs a vital function in controlling ICP, notably in sufferers with impaired consciousness or respiratory compromise. Managed hyperventilation, by lowering arterial carbon dioxide ranges, causes cerebral vasoconstriction, which might decrease ICP. Nonetheless, this method have to be used judiciously as extended hyperventilation can result in cerebral ischemia. Mechanical air flow additionally permits for airway safety and ensures enough oxygenation, that are important for sustaining mind well being. In a affected person with severely elevated ICP, managed hyperventilation could be employed as a short lived measure to quickly decrease ICP whereas different interventions are initiated.

  • Neuromonitoring and Vital Care

    Steady neuromonitoring, together with ICP monitoring, is crucial for guiding the multimodal strategy. This gives real-time information on ICP, CPP, and different physiological parameters, enabling clinicians to titrate interventions and assess remedy effectiveness. This data-driven strategy ensures that remedy methods are tailor-made to the person affected person’s evolving wants. The intensive care setting gives the required assets and experience for managing advanced instances and responding to acute modifications in neurological standing. As an example, steady ICP monitoring permits for the well timed adjustment of osmotic remedy or the initiation of surgical intervention if ICP stays uncontrolled regardless of preliminary medical administration.

The multimodal strategy to ICP administration in hemorrhagic stroke displays a complete understanding of the components influencing ICP and the necessity for individualized remedy methods. By integrating medical, surgical, and demanding care interventions, this strategy goals to attain the goal ICP whereas preserving cerebral perfusion and mitigating the danger of secondary mind damage. This built-in strategy is crucial for optimizing affected person outcomes and minimizing long-term neurological deficits following a hemorrhagic stroke.

7. Common Reassessment Essential

Common reassessment is essential within the administration of intracranial strain (ICP) following hemorrhagic stroke. The goal for ICP, usually cited as under 20 mmHg, is not a static endpoint however a information inside a dynamic medical image. Hemorrhagic stroke presents a consistently evolving physiological setting influenced by components corresponding to hematoma enlargement, edema formation, and the affected person’s systemic response. These components can considerably influence ICP and cerebral perfusion strain (CPP), necessitating ongoing analysis and adjustment of the therapeutic technique. With out common reassessment, the chosen ICP goal would possibly develop into inappropriate, resulting in both insufficient or extreme intervention. For instance, a affected person initially presenting with an ICP of 25 mmHg would possibly reply properly to medical administration, attaining an ICP of 15 mmHg. Nonetheless, subsequent hematoma enlargement may elevate the ICP once more, requiring additional intervention. With out reassessment, this transformation would go unnoticed, doubtlessly resulting in detrimental penalties.

The sensible significance of standard reassessment lies in its capacity to tailor remedy to the person affected person’s evolving wants. This includes frequent neurological examinations to evaluate for modifications in psychological standing, pupillary responses, and motor operate, indicating shifts in ICP and CPP. Repeat imaging research, corresponding to CT scans, can reveal modifications in hematoma measurement or the event of recent problems. Steady ICP monitoring gives real-time information, permitting for speedy changes to remedy. Common reassessment informs choices concerning osmotic remedy, blood strain administration, and the potential want for surgical intervention. As an example, if repeat imaging reveals vital hematoma enlargement, surgical evacuation would possibly develop into mandatory regardless of preliminary success with medical administration. Conversely, if ICP stays steady and inside the goal vary, ongoing remedy may be continued with out modification.

In conclusion, common reassessment varieties an integral part of focused ICP administration in hemorrhagic stroke. It permits for a dynamic and individualized strategy, guaranteeing that the chosen ICP goal stays acceptable all through the course of the sickness. This ongoing analysis and adjustment of remedy minimizes the danger of secondary mind damage by sustaining optimum ICP and CPP, in the end contributing to improved affected person outcomes. Challenges stay in standardizing reassessment protocols and integrating numerous monitoring modalities successfully. Nonetheless, the understanding of its essential function underscores the necessity for steady vigilance and adaptation in managing this advanced and dynamic situation.

Often Requested Questions

This part addresses frequent questions concerning intracranial strain (ICP) administration in hemorrhagic stroke, aiming to offer clear and concise info for healthcare professionals and people looking for a deeper understanding of this crucial side of neurocritical care.

Query 1: Why is exact ICP management so important in hemorrhagic stroke?

Exact ICP management is essential as a result of elevated ICP reduces cerebral blood move, doubtlessly resulting in ischemia and additional neurological harm. It will possibly additionally result in herniation syndromes, life-threatening problems involving the displacement of mind tissue. Cautious administration goals to mitigate these dangers.

Query 2: How is the particular ICP goal decided for a person affected person?

Whereas a common goal of under 20 mmHg is commonly cited, the optimum ICP goal is individualized primarily based on components corresponding to age, comorbidities, stroke severity, and the affected person’s general physiological standing. Sustaining enough cerebral perfusion strain (CPP) can be paramount.

Query 3: What are the first strategies used to watch ICP?

Intracranial strain is usually monitored utilizing invasive methods involving the insertion of a catheter into the mind, linked to a strain transducer. These strategies permit for steady and correct measurement of ICP, enabling well timed intervention.

Query 4: What interventions are employed to handle elevated ICP?

Interventions for elevated ICP vary from medical administration with osmotic diuretics and blood strain management to surgical interventions corresponding to hematoma evacuation or decompressive craniectomy. The particular strategy is dependent upon the person affected person’s situation and the severity of ICP elevation.

Query 5: How does CPP relate to ICP administration?

Cerebral perfusion strain (CPP), the distinction between imply arterial strain (MAP) and ICP, represents the driving power of blood move to the mind. Sustaining enough CPP is as essential as controlling ICP. Interventions should steadiness decreasing ICP with preserving CPP to make sure enough mind tissue oxygenation.

Query 6: What are the potential problems of aggressive ICP decreasing?

Overly aggressive ICP decreasing can compromise CPP, resulting in cerebral ischemia. Its important to undertake a balanced strategy that considers each ICP and CPP to keep away from inadvertently lowering blood move to the mind.

Efficient ICP administration in hemorrhagic stroke requires a nuanced strategy that considers particular person affected person components and emphasizes the steadiness between ICP management and CPP preservation. Steady monitoring and common reassessment are essential for adapting remedy methods to the affected person’s evolving wants.

The next sections will delve additional into particular points of ICP administration, exploring the newest analysis and developments on this crucial space of neurocritical care.

Ideas for Intracranial Strain Administration in Hemorrhagic Stroke

Optimizing intracranial strain (ICP) administration in hemorrhagic stroke requires a multifaceted strategy. The following pointers present sensible steerage for healthcare professionals navigating the complexities of this crucial side of neurocritical care. Emphasis stays on individualized affected person care and the dynamic nature of hemorrhagic stroke.

Tip 1: Prioritize Individualized Targets: Whereas pointers counsel sustaining ICP under 20 mmHg, this worth serves as a place to begin. The optimum goal is dependent upon patient-specific components like age, comorbidities, and stroke severity. A youthful affected person with a smaller hematoma might tolerate a barely increased ICP than an older affected person with pre-existing hypertension.

Tip 2: Constantly Monitor ICP and CPP: Actual-time information on ICP and cerebral perfusion strain (CPP) are important for guiding therapeutic choices. Steady monitoring permits immediate detection of modifications and facilitates well timed intervention, stopping secondary mind damage.

Tip 3: Preserve CPP inside a Secure Vary: Decreasing ICP mustn’t compromise CPP. Aggressive ICP discount can inadvertently lower imply arterial strain, resulting in insufficient cerebral blood move. A balanced strategy considers each ICP and CPP.

Tip 4: Make use of a Multimodal Method: Efficient administration usually requires combining medical, surgical, and demanding care interventions. Osmotic diuretics, blood strain administration, surgical decompression, and ventilatory help contribute to a complete technique.

Tip 5: Often Reassess the Affected person: ICP and CPP can fluctuate. Frequent neurological examinations, repeat imaging research, and steady information evaluation are important for adjusting remedy methods and guaranteeing the chosen goal stays acceptable.

Tip 6: Think about Superior Neuroimaging: Strategies like CT perfusion and MRI can present useful insights into cerebral blood move and tissue oxygenation, guiding choices concerning ICP administration and optimizing therapeutic interventions.

Tip 7: Seek the advice of with Specialists: Managing ICP in hemorrhagic stroke usually requires experience from numerous specialists, together with neurosurgeons, neurologists, and demanding care physicians. Collaboration ensures a complete and coordinated strategy.

The following pointers emphasize the significance of individualized care, steady monitoring, and a dynamic strategy to ICP administration. Adherence to those ideas contributes to optimized affected person outcomes and minimizes the danger of secondary mind damage following hemorrhagic stroke.

The next conclusion summarizes the important thing takeaways for efficient administration of intracranial strain in hemorrhagic stroke, reinforcing the significance of a balanced and patient-centered strategy.

Conclusion

Administration of intracranial strain (ICP) following hemorrhagic stroke requires a nuanced understanding of its dynamic interaction with cerebral perfusion. Whereas a goal ICP under 20 mmHg usually serves as a tenet, individualized targets primarily based on patient-specific components, together with age, comorbidities, and stroke severity, are paramount. Sustaining enough cerebral perfusion strain (CPP) is equally essential, requiring a balanced strategy that avoids overly aggressive ICP discount. Steady ICP and CPP monitoring, coupled with frequent neurological assessments and repeat imaging, permits dynamic adaptation of remedy methods. Multimodal administration, encompassing medical therapies, surgical interventions, and superior neuromonitoring, optimizes outcomes by mitigating secondary mind damage.

Advances in neurocritical care proceed to refine ICP administration methods in hemorrhagic stroke. Ongoing analysis focuses on optimizing individualized targets, refining monitoring methods, and creating novel therapeutic interventions. A deeper understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying secondary mind damage guarantees to additional improve focused ICP administration, in the end bettering affected person outcomes and lowering long-term incapacity following hemorrhagic stroke. Continued vigilance and a dedication to individualized, evidence-based care stay important for navigating the complexities of ICP administration on this difficult medical situation.